On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote:
> I worry that if we starting providing guidance to DNS names, then we need to
> worry about the I18N implications.  I don't remember if these are both case
> sensitive and easy to do the case conversion on.

Isn't this a solved problem?   You convert to the unicode presentation and then 
convert to the canonical case as defined in the unicode standard.   The worst 
case scenario is that you encounter some script where this rule doesn't work, 
and that script is then in the position that all scripts are in now.

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to