This clarification has been applied to the -34 drafts.
Thanks again,
-- Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Jones [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 12:54 AM
> To: Stephen Farrell; The IESG
> Cc: [email protected]; draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
> encryption-33: (with COMMENT)
>
> Thanks for your review, Stephen. I've added the working group to the thread
> so
> they're aware of your comment.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Farrell [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:56 AM
> > To: The IESG
> > Cc: [email protected]; draft-ietf-jose-json-web-
> > [email protected]
> > Subject: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on
> > draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-
> > 33: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption-33: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-json-web-encryption/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > 1.1/3.1/7.1: I think you should define BASE64URL(null) as null so that
> > one knows that one can see ".." in compact representations, e.g if
> > there this is no AAD or IV. Adding an example of such would be good
> > too. Or, if ".." is not allowed, then you need to say that clearly.
> > (This could be clarified loads of ways, I don't care which you pick.)
>
> Good idea. I'll try to figure out an appropriate place to editorially do
> this -
> maybe right at the definition. This is definitely used in practice.
>
> Thanks again,
> -- Mike
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
