What? I can't speak for Chrome, but Firefox completely ignores the "oth" parameter.
http://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/crypto/CryptoKey.cpp?from=PrivateKeyFromJwk#678 I think you're thinking of the extended, technically not-required RSA private parameters "p", "q", "dp", "dq", "qi". Firefox and Chrome DO both require those, because the underlying library requires them and we didn't want to implement factoring above the library layer (at least for Firefox). I'm not sure it makes sense for those parameters to be required at the JWK layer. On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Jim Schaad <[email protected]> wrote: > Based on email that has been sent to the list. It appears that both > Chrome and Firefox have fully implemented the “oth” parameter of RSA > private keys. They actually appear to require that it be present rather > than be optional as the document specifies. However this would mean to me > that this parameters is used and you can clear you discuss on that basis. > > > > Jim > > > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
