Hey, Matt. > I absolutely agree, and have been regularly soliciting people for > verifications and reviews.
Groovy! >> If the RFC Editor's editing should double-space the sentences, >> your examples based on the published cleartext would then be >> wrong. *Please* put notes in the document to the RFC Editor >> wrapping each instance of such text and making it clear that they >> must not alter the text in any way... and then please check that >> during AUTH48. > > I neglected this, but can add it to the next revision. To be honest, > I feared sprinkling such notes throughout a document that is 50%-75% > example would have the opposite effect than that intended. I have > been talking to RFC Editor folks about this document, and the > importance of leaving the importance of leaving the figures as-is. Ah, OK, that should be fine. As long as the RFC Editor is aware of where care needs to be taken, that should work... it's up to you whether you think it needs to be marked in the text or whether your conversations with the RFC Editor staff has been/will be sufficient. Barry _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
