Hi Anders
That resembles a bit a JWS JSON serialization format; if a signature is
taken on a thumbprint of the natural payload, then perhaps there's some
scope for the alignment there ?
Sergey
On 10/12/14 07:18, Anders Rundgren wrote:
Dropping XML DSig bloat and adding support for JOSE algorithms made JCS
even nicer:
{
"Statement": "Hello signed world!",
"OtherProperties": [2000,true],
"signature":
{
"algorithm": "ES256",
"publicKey":
{
"type": "EC",
"curve": "P-256",
"x": "vlYxD4dtFJOp1_8_QUcieWCW-4KrLMmFL2rpkY1bQDs",
"y": "fxEF70yJenP3SPHM9hv-EnvhG6nXr3_S-fDqoj-F6yM"
},
"value":
"MEUCIQDXU1ph6-MRs0upj5PHA_bOcUv0pz5zIpvcQowgVj_wzQIgRW1_VMuTtc7C64vMh2kKpdGC70tqjpAAcbnn2qnVGuE"
}
}
My claim that JSON parsers featured in browsers are compliant with JCS
was unfortunately not entirely correct -(
Properties expressed as numbers only ("1":"hi!"), are dealt with in a
special way. OTOH, this seems like an
unusual construct so it is not a show-stopper.
Cheers,
Anders
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
