1. Please review the email from James Manger on 4/14/14. It is not clear to me that all of the issues he raised were addressed as there was no response to the message. Particularly the questions of uniqueness for black listing of keys.
2. There seems to be consensus to not define the new header parameter for the time being. 3. There does not seem to be consensus at this time for what the method of serialization should be at this time. The current method is deemed overly complicated by a number of people, but nobody has proposed a method that people can accept as being future proof in the event that a key defines a structured field for a key parameter. A new draft can easily address the first two issues. I am not sure what procedure to follow to address the last one. Jim _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
