On 2015-10-29 23:01, Mike Jones wrote:
You're missing the point. It's not whether you can write custom code that
> will always do the same thing. I'm sure you can.
I hope so, math isn't really my forte :-)
It's whether the vast majority of deployed JSON serializers will also do
> exactly the same thing. They surely don't since they never had a reason to do that.
It's that latter that would need to be true in order for it to be a
> reasonable basis for a successful standard. JavaScript and the Web are (IMHO) big enough to drive this thing alone, the rest will join the party if/when they feel there is a need. Anders
-----Original Message----- From: jose [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anders Rundgren Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 2:55 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [jose] ES6-compatible JSON Number Canonicalizer in Java I have only spent some 10 hours on this code so I can't guarantee that it is perfect: https://github.com/cyberphone/openkeystore/blob/master/es6-numbers/src/com/example/es6numbers/Test.java Result: http://webpki.org/ietf/es6numbertest.html Anders _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
