thanks. It sounds reasonable. I will subscriber to CFRG mailing list so .
regards antonio On Feb 1, 2016, at 4:37 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > The IRTF's CFRG [1] are at the beginning of considering PQC > so I'd say discussion would be much better off there and not > (yet) in the IETF. IMO none of the PQC schemes are ready for > prime-time right now, so CFRG is a much better venue. > > Cheers, > S. > > [1] https://irtf.org/cfrg > > On 01/02/16 09:50, Antonio Sanso wrote: >> ops it look like I kind of fat fingered , meant >> >> A quantum computer will break totally this (thanks to Shor's algorithm). >> >> On Feb 1, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> hi *, >>> >>> I know that this might sounds a bit crazy but I think that is time to kind >>> of think about Post Quantum Cryptography (and JOSE should not be left out). >>> But let me rewind a bit. >>> According to the last research (done from IBM et al) and NSA suggestions, >>> having a quantum computer is “only” 8/15 years from now (maybe earlier) >>> Taking as example JWS it support RSA signature. A quantum computer will >>> break computer will break totally this (thanks to Show algorithms). >>> Thinking about start to expand JWS specification to use some of the PQC is >>> not so inimmaginable IMHO. >>> For example having JWS supporting Hash based signatures would be a great >>> move (always IMHO :)) for JOSE and JWS. >>> >>> WDYT? >>> >>> antonio >>> >>> P.S. a great post about Hash based signatures and Merkle tree is at >>> https://www.imperialviolet.org/2013/07/18/hashsig.html >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jose mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jose mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >> _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
