On 2 August 2016 at 21:17, Justin Richer <[email protected]> wrote: > Side note about the percent encoding, is the spec not clear enough about > that as input for the hash calculation?
It is very much underspecified. You talk about strings, but header fields are sequences of octets. Percent-encoding is not mentioned at all and URL normalization [RFC7230] is not mentioned either. The text on duplicated entries needs work (as noted). > Happy to take suggested text. I'm glad to hear it, but I apologize that I really can't spare the time. Hopefully I've given you a few pointers that you can use. _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
