Dear lists; As you may have seen, the concept for "SIgned JSON" outlined in https://github.com/cyberphone/jws-jcs#combining-detached-jws-with-jcs-json-canonicalization-scheme and testable at https://mobilepki.org/jws-jcs/home, depends on a JSON canonicalization scheme currently described in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rundgren-json-canonicalization-scheme-00.
Would it be possible indicating if you have any interest in a possible standard for JSON canonicalization and if you will attend IETF-102? BTW, it appears to be a number of other JSON-related things that are on the verge becoming de-facto standards such as comments and support for numbers outside of IEEE-754 double precision. Should JSON canonicalization follow the same path? Cheers, Anders Rundgren _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
