Anders, I really like what you have done with this. I am trying to figure out if it will work 100% for my needs, or if it will need some tweaking. If it does work, then I think we should really try and figure out how we get your work standardized.
Thanks, Bret PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050 "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." > On Oct 11, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Anders Rundgren <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Before dismissing Canonical JSON, you may take it for spin at: > https://mobilepki.org/jws-jcs/home > > This particular signature variant is 100% JWS compatible. > > Although enveloped signatures may be "out of fashion", I find them quite > practical since they don't interfere with the message structure. > > An example: In the IETF TEEP work (building on JOSE), the designers were > forced adding an unsigned outer JSON layer in order to get a reasonable > system. > > The idea is not replacing JOSE, only creating a viable alternative for folks > who don't want to shroud their precious JSON data in Base64Url! > > Thanks, > Anders
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
