Sorry - typo on my part - should be 4802.   BUT NOT MY FAULT.  You will
notice that the link in the errata below has the wrong number in it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Kaduk <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2019 9:27 AM
To: Jim Schaad <[email protected]>
Cc: 'RFC Errata System' <[email protected]>; [email protected];
Roman Danyliw <[email protected]>; 'Matthew A. Miller'
<[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7520 (4801)

Hi Jim,

I started looking at this, but I can't find an errata report with eid 4801;
there is https://www.rfc-editor.org/verify_errata_select.php?eid=4802 which
looks quite similar to what is quoted below (but includes additional
commentary in both the old and new text boxes :(

Can you please check that eid 4802 is the content you want us to be
handling?

Thanks,

Ben

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 12:16:05PM -0800, Jim Schaad wrote:
> I went through to start getting all of the JOSE errata cleaned out.  
> After consulting with Matt, I believe that this errata should be 
> accepted as editorial - hold for update.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jose <[email protected]> On Behalf Of RFC Errata System
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 1:13 AM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; 
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [jose] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7520 (4801)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7520, "Examples 
> of Protecting Content Using JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7520&eid=4801
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Wrong JSON Flattened Representation <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 5.7.5
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The figure 150 is:
> 
>    {
>      "protected": "eyJhbGciOiJBMjU2R0NNS1ciLCJpdiI6IktrWVQwR1hfMm
>          pIbGZxTl8iLCJraWQiOiIxOGVjMDhlMS1iZmE5LTRkOTUtYjIwNS0yYj
>          RkZDFkNDMyMWQiLCJ0YWciOiJrZlBkdVZRM1QzSDZ2bmV3dC0ta3N3Ii
>          wiZW5jIjoiQTEyOENCQy1IUzI1NiJ9",
>      "encrypted_key": "lJf3HbOApxMEBkCMOoTnnABxs_CvTWUmZQ2ElLvYNo
>          k",
>      "iv": "gz6NjyEFNm_vm8Gj6FwoFQ",
>      "ciphertext": "Jf5p9-ZhJlJy_IQ_byKFmI0Ro7w7G1QiaZpI8OaiVgD8E
>          qoDZHyFKFBupS8iaEeVIgMqWmsuJKuoVgzR3YfzoMd3GxEm3VxNhzWyW
>          tZKX0gxKdy6HgLvqoGNbZCzLjqcpDiF8q2_62EVAbr2uSc2oaxFmFuIQ
>          HLcqAHxy51449xkjZ7ewzZaGV3eFqhpco8o4DijXaG5_7kp3h2cajRfD
>          gymuxUbWgLqaeNQaJtvJmSMFuEOSAzw9Hdeb6yhdTynCRmu-kqtO5Dec
>          4lT2OMZKpnxc_F1_4yDJFcqb5CiDSmA-psB2k0JtjxAj4UPI61oONK7z
>          zFIu4gBfjJCndsZfdvG7h8wGjV98QhrKEnR7xKZ3KCr0_qR1B-gxpNk3
>          xWU",
>      "tag": "NvBveHr_vonkvflfnUrmBQ"
>    }
> 
> But the figure 147 indicates the tag is "DKW7jrb4WaRSNfbXVPlT5g".
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The figure 150 should be:
> 
>    {
>      "protected": "eyJhbGciOiJBMjU2R0NNS1ciLCJpdiI6IktrWVQwR1hfMm
>          pIbGZxTl8iLCJraWQiOiIxOGVjMDhlMS1iZmE5LTRkOTUtYjIwNS0yYj
>          RkZDFkNDMyMWQiLCJ0YWciOiJrZlBkdVZRM1QzSDZ2bmV3dC0ta3N3Ii
>          wiZW5jIjoiQTEyOENCQy1IUzI1NiJ9",
>      "encrypted_key": "lJf3HbOApxMEBkCMOoTnnABxs_CvTWUmZQ2ElLvYNo
>          k",
>      "iv": "gz6NjyEFNm_vm8Gj6FwoFQ",
>      "ciphertext": "Jf5p9-ZhJlJy_IQ_byKFmI0Ro7w7G1QiaZpI8OaiVgD8E
>          qoDZHyFKFBupS8iaEeVIgMqWmsuJKuoVgzR3YfzoMd3GxEm3VxNhzWyW
>          tZKX0gxKdy6HgLvqoGNbZCzLjqcpDiF8q2_62EVAbr2uSc2oaxFmFuIQ
>          HLcqAHxy51449xkjZ7ewzZaGV3eFqhpco8o4DijXaG5_7kp3h2cajRfD
>          gymuxUbWgLqaeNQaJtvJmSMFuEOSAzw9Hdeb6yhdTynCRmu-kqtO5Dec
>          4lT2OMZKpnxc_F1_4yDJFcqb5CiDSmA-psB2k0JtjxAj4UPI61oONK7z
>          zFIu4gBfjJCndsZfdvG7h8wGjV98QhrKEnR7xKZ3KCr0_qR1B-gxpNk3
>          xWU",
>      "tag": "DKW7jrb4WaRSNfbXVPlT5g"
>    }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please 
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. 
> When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to 
> change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7520 (draft-ietf-jose-cookbook-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Examples of Protecting Content Using JSON Object
> Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
> Publication Date    : May 2015
> Author(s)           : M. Miller
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Javascript Object Signing and Encryption
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to