On 2020-07-10, at 22:21, Mike Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > There are things I would have commented on in JCS
Much of what discussion we had happened on the JSON mailing list. There is a map (JSON object) key ordering mechanism in there for which I only have the word “sick”, and this was commented on the JSON mailing list [1] (in slightly more elaborate wording). That “feature” is still in there. No comment. The disturbing part is that people are now running ahead and are trying to do run-arounds around the JOSE format based on the old XMLDSig thinking. I certainly suspected that was the point of JCS, but it plaid no role in the IESG conflict review for this independent submission — I have seen very inconsistent levels of attention in IESG to considerations about how a spec will actually be used over time. Grüße, Carsten [1]: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/IePAqXNJ3On_mSRbJGn6zYt-HRs> _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
