Hi folks, I've heard that the JOSE WG is considered to be restarted.
Currently, during some discussions on "Use of HPKE with COSE''[1] in the COSE WG, the topic of how to represent HPKE public keys has been raised[2][3]. Specifically, it concerns whether encapsulated keys (ephemeral **sender** public keys) for HPKE should be represented by COSE_Key (binary version of JWK) or not and I am of the opinion that it is not necessary to express them in COSE_Key. On the other hand, however, I'm thinking it would be better to have a standardized way and format for publishing **recipient** public keys for HPKE. In particular, I believe that if we can express them in very popular JWK format and publish them via developer-friendly jwks_uri endpoints the use of HPKE on the application layer will be facilitated. Would this topic be inside the scope of the new JOSE WG planned to be re-chartered? I would like to hear from the experts on this mailing list. Best regards, Ajitomi, Daisuke [1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-cose-hpke-02.html [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/kI10B-xaIUFTeN2lZNXKsgYBMSs [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/Rg_AAtgOL4p9SdlXHyL8-0HSrI8
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
