I support adoption. I wonder if Ryan Sleevi's insightful analysis of issues around the FastFed standard [1] and the sharing of JWK Sets over HTTPS might be distilled into some concrete recommendations in this guidance? I'm happy to look at that and suggest some text at some point.
[1]: https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vQQ-FhNjW0ZhZVTnK1VG_87IBNZKBaJmweYZb1VBRdQCMAWXekqKfxdNl8wL6FWFDJ9pxXxpr66-GZp/pub <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/e/2PACX-1vQQ-FhNjW0ZhZVTnK1VG_87IBNZKBaJmweYZb1VBRdQCMAWXekqKfxdNl8wL6FWFDJ9pxXxpr66-GZp/pub> -- Neil > On 2 Jan 2024, at 19:22, Karen ODonoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > > JOSE working group members, > > This email starts a two week call for adoption for: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tschofenig-jose-cose-guidance/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tschofenig-jose-cose-guidance/> > > As discussed at the November IETF meeting, with the approved expansion of the > charter to include maintenance items, this document is now within scope. > > Please reply to this email with your comments on the adoption of this > document as a starting point for the related JOSE work item. > > This call will end on Wednesday, 17 January 2024. > > Thank you, > JOSE co-chairs > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
