Dear Joseans, I've read the recently revised complex of drafts, and have some questions about how we envision profiling working. It seems like the documents defer a lot of the capabilities to the algorithms document, while imposing some convention on what the claims representation along the lines of "the names of the claims are strings suitable for JSON object keys and have an order, and the claim values can only be selectively revealed". This matters for both developing more algorithms and for profilng: it may be that we end up with a profile having to pick an algorithm, and that new algorithms with new capabilities end up needing special treatment at the level of say SPICE.
Secondly I'm curious where things like binding to upper level protocols or enclaves are supposed to fit in here. Sincerely, Watson Ladd -- Astra mortemque praestare gradatim _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
