On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 20:12, AJITOMI Daisuke <[email protected]> wrote:

> > I think we should use HPKE until there is reason not to use it.
>
> I agree.
>
> Regarding ML-KEM, I was thinking that we should add X-Wing as a PQ/T
> Hybrid KEM to the list of COSE-HPKE ciphersuites at first.
>
> X-Wing: general-purpose hybrid post-quantum KEM
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-cfrg-xwing-kem/
>

X-wing is specific to hybrid schemes and it is back-ward compatible with
X25519Kyber768Draft00. The COSE and JOSE HPKE specifications can use the
above hybrid scheme which is already registered in HPKE IANA registry.

-Tiru


>
>
> Daisuke
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-connolly-cfrg-xwing-kem/
>
> 2024年3月5日(火) 22:32 Orie Steele <[email protected]>:
>
>> Draft looks very familiar after have spent so much time with HPKE.
>>
>> And it would be nice to have at least one pq encryption suite on track
>> for standardization.
>>
>> Having different direct mode alg values for ML-KEM and HPKE that are both
>> basically telling you to look an enc... Is wasting registry space.
>>
>> alg: dir, is sufficient.
>>
>> The documents that register the new enc modes can explain why.
>>
>> I think it would be better to see ML-KEM suites in HPKE, instead of
>> seeing duplicates.
>>
>> There will also be different security issues, without the HPKE context
>> and key commiting, etc...
>>
>> There will be worse interop with 2 ways to do the same things.
>>
>> With hydrids on the horizon... it's a mistake to register hydrids
>> twice... Once for HPKE and once for standalone.
>>
>> I think we should use HPKE until there is reason not to use it.
>>
>> Is this draft motivated by implementers who could not use HPKE?
>>
>> Are there critical use cases that multiple vendors need to support that
>> only work without using HPKE?
>>
>> OS
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024, 5:34 AM tirumal reddy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> We have published a new draft
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem-00.html,
>>> that describes the conventions for using Post-Quantum Key Encapsulation
>>> Mechanisms (PQ-KEMs) within JOSE and COSE.  Although this mechanism could
>>> be used with any PQ-KEM, this document focuses on Module-Lattice-based Key
>>> Encapsulation Mechanisms (ML-KEMs).
>>>
>>> Comments and Suggestions are welcome.
>>>
>>> -Tiru
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 10:32
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>>> draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem-00.txt
>>> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy.K <[email protected]>, Aritra Banerjee <
>>> [email protected]>, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>,
>>> Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem-00.txt has
>>> been
>>> successfully submitted by Tirumaleswar Reddy and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Name:     draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem
>>> Revision: 00
>>> Title:    Post-Quantum Key Encapsulation Mechanisms (PQ KEMs) for JOSE
>>> and COSE
>>> Date:     2024-03-03
>>> Group:    Individual Submission
>>> Pages:    16
>>> URL:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem-00.txt
>>> Status:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem/
>>> HTML:
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem-00.html
>>> HTMLized:
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc-kem
>>>
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>>
>>>    This document describes the conventions for using Post-Quantum Key
>>>    Encapsulation Mechanisms (PQ-KEMs) within JOSE and COSE.
>>>
>>> About This Document
>>>
>>>    This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
>>>
>>>    Status information for this document may be found at
>>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-cose-jose-pqc/.
>>>
>>>    Discussion of this document takes place on the cose Working Group
>>>    mailing list (mailto:[email protected]), which is archived at
>>>    https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/.  Subscribe at
>>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose/.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jose mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> COSE mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose
>>
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to