On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 12:15 -0600, Brian Campbell wrote: > > I might humbly suggest that the prospective updates, while perhaps mostly > editorial, are fairly fundamental to the content of the draft itself and > should be applied to the draft prior to (a new) WGCL. Resolving the draft's > many outright self-contradictory statements would likely go a long way > towards avoiding feedback at the level of "this draft is still deeply > confused and not anywhere near ready for publication" and facilitate a more > productive last call cycle that's a better use of everyone's time.
100% this, it is there is rough agreement on the direction, but the wording of the draft is nowhere near what is needed for a WGLC. -- Simo Sorce Distinguished Engineer RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
