JOSE working group members, While there is clear consensus that this draft is important, I do think that there are valid arguments that we need to do another pass to address the rather extensive comments before proceeding to make a final determination. The chairs suggest an updated document and a short 2nd WGLC afterward provided that all the issues raised are adequately addressed. I note that a number of emails on the WGLC haven't been responded to yet.
Regards, JOSE chairs On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 1:31 AM Karen ODonoghue <[email protected]> wrote: > JOSE working group members, > > This email initiates a three week working group last call on the following > document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/ > > All open issues have been resolved. Additionally there does not appear to > be general support for including fully-specified ECDH algorithms. > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/ZHDlXENvTwjlWxTVQQ2hkNBX4dw/ > > Please review the document and post any final comments along with your > recommendation on whether or not it is ready to proceed by the Monday 27 > May. > > Thank you, > JOSE chairs > >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
