Hi,

I appreciate the draft and I clearly recognize its value, It fills a gap
that we should not understimate.

I support adoption, implementations will have benefits from it

best

Il gio 12 set 2024, 18:48 Karen ODonoghue <[email protected]> ha scritto:

> JOSE and COSE working group members,
>
> This WGLC is currently scheduled to conclude on 13 September
> (tomorrow). I am not currently comfortable with the number and clarity
> of responses received. Please respond clearly indicating whether or
> not you think this document is ready to proceed (pending the comments
> raised in your response). To give you all a bit more time, I'm
> extending the WGLC one week to next Friday (20 September 2024).
>
> Please take a few minutes and review the updated draft!
>
> Thanks,
> Karen
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:10 AM Karen ODonoghue <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > JOSE working group members,
> >
> > This email initiates a second working group last call for the Fully
> > Specified Algorithms document:
> >
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/
> >
> > The authors have updated the draft based on WGLC comments and
> > discussions at IETF 120, and the chairs have polled the working group
> > about the readiness for WGLC. Seeing no opposition, we've decided to
> > proceed with a second WGLC.
> >
> > Please review the document in detail and reply to this message
> > (keeping the subject line intact) with your opinion on the readiness
> > of this document for publication and any additional comments that you
> > have.
> >
> > This will be a three week WGLC. Please submit your responses by 13
> > September 2024.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Karen (for the JOSE WG chairs)
>
> _______________________________________________
> jose mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to