Hello David, Note that, for the record, I have suggested changes to the document in its very early (before WG adoption) stages, specifically about the new JOSE algorithm identifier values themselves. I have also reviewed the document during its two Working Group Last Calls.
Nevertheless, I have reviewed the IANA registrations section again and I find them in good order wrt the JOSE registries. A small nit though: in #section-4.4-3.2 <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07.html#section-4.4-3.2> I found a typo. Proposed a PR to fix it here <https://github.com/ietf-wg-jose/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/pull/29> . S pozdravem, *Filip Skokan* On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 18:12, David Dong via RT < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Sean Turner, Filip Skokan (cc: Mike Jones, jose WG, jose-reg-review > mailing list), > > As the designated experts for the JSON Web Signature and Encryption > Algorithms registry, can you review the proposed registrations in > draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07 for us? Please note that Mike > is one of the authors for this document. > > Please see: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/ > > The due date is March 18. > > If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll > make the registration at: > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/jose/ > > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewer, we’ll act on the first > response we receive. > > With thanks, > > David Dong > IANA Services Sr. Specialist >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
