On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 15:26 -0500, Orie wrote: > Just so I understand, your proposal is that kty should be used to express > ML-DSA-44, ML-DSA-65 ... ML-KEM-768 ... X-WING and that alg should remain > optional. > > We should then register these key types and any desired algorithms that are > supported for each key type. > alg would still be used to restrict algorithms within a given key type, but > the fingerprint for a key would not commit to the algorithm. > So an ML-DSA-65 and HASH-ML-DSA-65 public key would have the same > fingerprint. > > This is similar to proposals that Ilari and others discussed at the > beginning of the work.
Correct. -- Simo Sorce Distinguished Engineer RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
