Hi Éric, We've published -11 incorporating your suggestions. Thanks for your useful review of the specification!
You can see the diffs from History section of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/, as always. Thanks again, -- Mike -----Original Message----- From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 10:50 AM To: The IESG <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-10: (with COMMENT) Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the work done in this document. Just some non-blocking COMMENTs # Abstract The abstract should mention that some algorithms are deprecated. # Section 2.1 s/The following fully-specified COSE ECDSA algorithms are defined/The following fully-specified COSE ECDSA algorithms are defined by this document/ Similar comment for section 2.2 _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
