Richard Barnes <[email protected]> wrote:
    > JOSE and COSE should adopt a single format for ML-KEM and ML-DSA private
    > keys, and that format should be the seed format.  We should skate to where
    > the puck is headed.

Agreed.
I do not object to using the same container as LAMPS, but saying that the
expanded key is **always** ignored, and SHOULD never be present.

However, we could do with no/less DER.

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to