On Fri, 2025-10-10 at 11:49 +0530, tirumal reddy wrote: > > The decision that it is for interoperability is already discussed and > finalized in Section 4 of draft-ietf-cose-dilithium. This document aligns > with that decision
There is no need to repeat a controversial statement (that adds nothing to the decision made in the document) just because they are present in another IETF document. The COSE draft should drop that incorrect statement as well IMO. -- Simo Sorce Distinguished Engineer RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
