Good that you updated and keep this alive. You likely have to to some work when FIPS 206 ipd is published. But would suggest to keep the draft short, we don’t need more long draft describing everything quantum.
- “FALCON512” - “FALCON1024” The draft could/should already now remove the term Falcon. The final draft should not use the term Falcon expept “previously known as Falcon”. Cheers, John From: Wayne Chang <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, 12 October 2025 at 03:29 To: Orie <[email protected]> Cc: cose <[email protected]>, JOSE WG <[email protected]> Subject: [jose] Re: draft-ietf-cose-falcon-02 You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> Thank you Orie, it's important we have compact PQC standardized. I appreciate your work on this and will be tracking its maturity closely for inclusion into our production stack. Best, Wayne Chang Founder & CEO | SpruceID<https://spruceid.com/> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/waynebuilds/> On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 12:00 PM, Orie <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, As directed by cose chairs, I have refreshed this WG adopted draft, and modernized its tooling. The draft is now maintained in the working group github repo: https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-falcon I've left sections blank that are waiting for FIPS-206 to be published before I can say anything clever there. I've also aligned this draft with ML-DSA and SLH-DSA. There is a related PR open on the SLH-DSA draft here: https://github.com/cose-wg/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/pull/10 Regards, OS _______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
