On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote: > While this is *generally* ok, it should not be used as an excuse to > break JOSM to the point where it doesn't compile anymore and then have > others clean up...
Ooops. Worked here. I didn't mean to fix broken code, but rather to fix it regarding improvements or different design aspects. > PLEASE do not check in code that does not compile with Java 1.5. (I > removed the "Override" statements. Please someone check whether these > methods are really needed... if they don't override something then who > calls them?) Sometimes I have the feeling ant doesn't do proper dependency tracking always. Can that be? Or are the errors you corrected no problem with newer Java? In that case I would need a way to at least get warnings in case such things occur. Is there something like "--ansi" in C/C++ to test against different standard variants? Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/josm-dev
