2008/8/16 Dirk Stöcker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This information is shown in the ToolTip. You get this when waiting a > short time over the error message.
Ah yes, so it is... It does force me to mouseover each violation, though. For a large or detailed area, this is going to be very impractical. > Actually this is already implemented. It's only moved to the ToolTip for > two reasons: > > a) There is so little space there in the Validator window True - but to me, the existing top-level message isn't actually useful, and could easily be replaced with the more specific message. Furthermore, if I decide (as I am likely to) that it will be generally acceptable for tertiary roads in my area not to have ref attributes, I would value the ability to collapse and ignore a whole set of violations. As it is, I'm going to have to search through a list of acceptable violations to find the ones I really care about. > b) When I change the generic error message, the valdition dialog will be > filled with lots of different message types. This makes finding certain > types more difficult. Which types? As far as I can see, the only violations that will be separated based on my suggestions are the ones that are already unlike each other. Dermot -- -------------------------------------- Iren sind menschlich _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
