On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Jiri Klement wrote: > I did some benchmarks and here are the results: > no date handling at all - 17 seconds > josm-ng date conversion - 19.5 seconds > josm-ng date conversion done with char[] instead of string - 18.8 seconds. > > josm-ng version is 13% slower but that makes only 2.5 seconds on 80MB > file. Also it allows more memory efficient storage of timestamp. I > personally would get rid of lazy parsing parsing and use Petr's > version. What do you think?
If it slows down the import and has advantages during runtime I vote for the optimized version. I can live with a little bit longer import if the overall performance is increased. Ciao -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available) _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
