On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Robert Scott <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tuesday 10 November 2009, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Cool. I've patched my fork here with this functionality:
http://github.com/avar/paperwalking
Sent a pull request to migurski/paperwalking.
If only JOSM development were so flexible and easy.
+1
Having JOSM in git would certainly be easier for sending in the
occasional patch, especially with JOSM's SVN access policy.
GIT is something for power developers. Power developers usually get
JOSM SVN access very fast, so git and occasional patch are contrary
concepts.
P.S. When I last tried git I found it very frustrating to reach otherwise
very easy tasks. It may be optimal for distributed development, but makes
the normal development more complicated. When we have > 50 developers and
different branches I promise to think about other revision control
systems.
I know and use lots of CVS and SVN repositories, but actually I know only
2 git repositories and only used one.
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)
_______________________________________________
josm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
