On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:21:54 +0200, Marko Mäkelä <[email protected]> wrote: > Someone already fixed this by removing the lakes-within-islands from the > multipolygon relation and by removing natural=land from the islands, so > that > the islands would be "empty" and no multipolygons will be needed for > them. > The proper solution would be to keep the natural=land and define separate > multipolygons for each island that contains lakes. I might do that > later. >
I fixed them, but i disagree on the correctness of natural=land. The multipolygon relation already unambiguously says that the "holes" are land if there's no other tags sayng that it's eg. wood etc. Also if the lake-within-island doesn't itself have islands, it doesn't need to be a multipolygon, as it is residing in the "hole" (island) of the larger lake. Teemu Koskinen _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
