I will next encapsulate/isolate the changes, yes. I am also more interested in optimizing the generated code, will work on some optimizations first. mike
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:51, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:16 AM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Thats great, I will test build it. >>> >>> I have been dreaming last night about compiling josm with the GNU Java >>> Compiler: >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/java/ >> >> dream come true!!!! >> >> http://github.com/h4ck3rm1k3/josm/commit/2432202f867953559d973387bc28ef66acf039f7 >> >> It works, I now have a gnu java compiler version of josm running, I >> removed the proxy support because that does not work with classpath. >> we might be able to implement that some other time. >> also the rounding of the division is left to do, we will see if it >> causes big problems. >> >> i made my first commit with it >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4511174 >> >> http://github.com/downloads/h4ck3rm1k3/josm/josm-custom.jar > > That's awesome. Nice to see some development happening with the mirror. > > Doesn't Java have some macro-like system or a way to hack it with Ant > so that gcj support can be merged back in? Maybe by subclassing those > files you modified and tell ant to compile FooGCJ.java under gcj and > just Foo.java otherwise. > > Also doesn't GCJ support compiling to object code instead of a .jar > via GCC? Did you try that? If so how does it compare speed/memory > wise? > > Does running with GCJ also suffer from the odd little bugs everywhere > you get with OpenJDK? > _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
