Richard Fairhurst wrote: > ... > I don't want to get into an editor argument here
Right, don't start a fight you can't win. :) > In http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4653538 , a vast > number of relations have been deleted - 66 or so. In potlatch I didn't manage to delete a _single_ relation, so this clearly is a big plus for JOSM. > , but I do know from bitter experience that if Potlatch let you do > this without realising, there would have been people screaming for my > head for months now. For some reason it's quite popular to pick on potlatch (especially in Germany), don't take it personal... > Could I entreat the JOSM developers to put some serious effort into > identifying and fixing this at the very earliest opportunity? Have you talked to the user? If he remembers how it happened there might be a tiny chance to identify the cause but otherwise there really isn't much one can do about it. If we had more reports of this kind, it would be a different matter. Sebastian _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
