> This is such a strange discussion, which comes up from time to time on > various mailinglists and everybody is convinced his opinion is right. > Actually I see no big difference between both and prefer the > Reply-To-List default which is equal to the way usenet postings are done > (probably I'm too old, as I used usenet long before mailinglists :-). > > My mails have a Reply-To-List always (because I much more often got > double mails due to unexperienced authors than I got private mails over > lists) and until now the "But-I-Cant-Send-To-Author" fraction never > complained.
I'd like to get my mails as dupes. Which means i can respond much more quickly. I tend to not look into the mailinglist folders to often. And i also forward mails into the inbox to other locations for prompt reaction. Flo -- Florian Lohoff [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
