When Bing is too pixelated it is inconvenient too. I think it's better to do it user-configurable.
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Dave Hansen <d...@sr71.net> wrote: > From the code comment: > > In general, smaller zoom levels are more readable. We prefer big, > block, pixelated (but readable) map text to small, smeared, > unreadable underzoomed text. So, use .floor() instead of rounding > to skew things a bit toward the lower zooms. > > The second hunk changes the range in which we start looking for an > autozoom. The old code was fairly picky about when it tried to change > autozoom levels. It was expensive to calculate. The new code is _much_ > nicer and cleaner. But, it also removed some code that tended to let it > autozoom sooner. The end result is that we are sticking with high zoom > levels too aggressively which leads to quite unreadable text. This > tweaks the pixelScaling limits to go looking for more autozoom levels > more often. > > -- Dave > > _______________________________________________ > josm-dev mailing list > josm-dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev > > -- Best regards, Upliner _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
