Hi, Maybe this is wishful thinking, but I'd like to eliminate as many false positives in the validator as possible.
On the one hand I'd like to ask where it is developed. I may be able to lend a hand with the coding. There are some issues with bicycle and hiking/foot route relations, where until now I just shrugged and glossed over them, but it's better to fix it, as I'm noticing other contributors also stumble across them. I know a lot about how these route relations are used in The Netherlands, Belgium and parts of Germany (numbered node networks). On the other hand I'd like to propose a tag for nodes which are between streets like (real examples): Bruggesteenweg/Brugsesteenweg Ooststraat/Weststraat I don't think it makes sense to go through all the motions of proposing it on tagging, but I'll document it on the wiki if you consider using it in the validator. It might be more convenient to tag it on both adjacent ways, but then it would multiply when those ways are split. So adding it on the connecting node seems cleaner. It could be note=similarly_named_ways_boundary or similarly_named_ways_boundary=yes or something else altogether, as long as the validator can recognise and use it. Cheers, Polyglot _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
