Am 17.08.2020 um 22:40 schrieb Stephan Knauss: > > Can you elaborate a bit more in what way you wish this to be more > structured? > > It is there to list similar tags. Do you want to structure the level > of "similarity"?
To avoid any misunderstandings this is not about individual tags, but about the real world objects complete preset items describe. The typical use of linked presets (and where they make most sense) is to add "sets" of tags that would overload the preset in question if added as individual tags. One of the frequent use of them in JOSM is for address and contact fields. This is semantically something totally different than suggesting an alternative preset item (because the current one might be a common mistagging, the alternative might be a more specific object, etc). And because it is semantically different it should be presented differently. > >> - add an attribute to the preset_link element, example > >> <preset_link preset_name="Mast" alternative="true" /> > > So what else besides "alternative" do you suggest? > >> - introduce a new element, example >> <alternative preset_name="Mast" /> > I do not see the difference here. > besides "link" for generic links, this "preset_link" already is a link > specific for alternative presets. What would a new one differentiate? See above, that is not actually how the majority of the linked presets are used. The concept is a recent introduction (if it wasn't, please explain why the "Similar but different tags:" text is necessary). > > >> - introduce a new element as a container, example > All references to "similar" presets are already known by the presence > of "preset_link". As you would have either one "alternatives" in case > there are links, or zero if not, what is the benefit of another > container level? > Again, see above. > Stephan > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
