I don't know where you got the idea that versions before 1.2.5 did
that. $.ajaxSetup hasn't been touched for a long time.
jörn
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:56 PM, sui-sing Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so the fact that parameters "a, b, c ..." are accepted by the version
> before 1.2.5 is actually a bug?
>
> 2008/9/22 Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> "data" is an option for $.ajax, like url. You can use ajaxSetup to set
>> defaults without explicitly specifiying them every time you call
>> $.ajax. $.ajaxSetup does NOT accept arbitrary parameters like a, b or
>> c. That doesn't make any sense at all.
>>
>> Jörn
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:39 PM, sui-sing Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> btw, to test the case of "this" object, maybe we can check the
>>> constructor of the "this" is what we expected.
>>>
>>> 2008/9/22 sui-sing Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> for the test case, maybe is good to pass in different datatype in
>>>> $.ajaxSetup();
>>>> e.g.
>>>>
>>>> $.ajaxSetup({ a : null, b:123, c:new Object(), d:"this is a test",
>>>> f:this, g:true, .... etc}
>>>>
>>>> ~ sglai
>>>>
>>>> 2008/9/22 Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you provide a test case ? thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ariel Flesler
>>>>> http://flesler.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 21, 11:26 am, "sui-sing Lai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> ok, I tried to pass "this" object to ajax callback.
>>>>>> I refer to jQuery doc and find out that I can pass it to via
>>>>>> $.ajaxSetup( { mydata : this } ).
>>>>>> code go like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> var myObj = function() {
>>>>>> $.ajaxSetup({mydata:this});
>>>>>> $.ajax({
>>>>>> ....
>>>>>> success:function(xml){ this.mydata.status = 200}
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this is better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> sglai
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2008/9/21 Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Could you be more specific about the actual issue?
>>>>>> > $.ajaxSetup({mydata:this}) doesn't make much sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Jörn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:58 AM, sglai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Happen to find this problem. Does release test case cover this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Regards,
>>>>>> >> sglai
>>>>> >>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
