If this is a common pattern perhaps a new method/plugin could be made to
make the code more explicit.
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'val');
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'text');
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'html');
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'class');
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'css', 'color');
$('#foo').copy('#bar', 'css', ['color', 'font-family']);
--
Brandon Aaron
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Cloudream <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> May cause a little confuse:
>
> $("#one").html( $("#two") );
> == $("#one").html( $("#two").html() ); or == $("#one").html( $
> ("#two").val() || $("#two").text() ); ?
>
> What about:
> $("#one").css("color",$("#two")) == $("#one").css("color", $
> ("#two").css("color") )
> $("#one").bind("click",$("#two")) == $("#one").bind("click", click
> function of $("#two") )
>
> :P
>
> On Sep 27, 1:59 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm curious: Are there any pieces of code that use jQuery, right now,
> > that you feel are unelegant or ugly? (Presumably ones that've already
> > been optimized to the best of their ability.)
> >
> > One area of improvement that I was thinking of was something along the
> lines of:
> >
> > // ugly
> > $("#foo").val( $("#bar").val() );
> >
> > // a bit better
> > $("#foo").val( $("#bar") );
> >
> > this would be an easy change, just make .attr() do something like:
> >
> > if ( arg.jquery )
> > val = arg.val() || arg.text() || "";
> >
> > Any other thoughts? I wonder if there are common cases that could be
> > improved with some simple code additions to core.
> >
> > --John
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
