The usage of compare shouldn't change, I'll just try to merge compare and compare2 into one method, and maybe into equals, if that is possible. Currently also compare isn't recursive, so only a certain depth is checked.
Jörn On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying Jörn, I only looked at the documentation, until > now :-) > > So I could use compare, although it might change in the future... > > > --Klaus > > > > > On 2 Okt., 14:56, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Hi Klaus, >> >> currently equals does only flat comparisons, while the undocumented >> compare and compare2 functions to deep checks, one for arrays, one for >> objects. I plan to investigate if any test breaks when extending >> equals to cover that all. Otherwise an deepEquals may be a good >> alternative. Runtime is also an issue: The full jQuery core and UI >> testsuites already take quite some time to run, so a default deep >> equals has to be fast enough. >> >> Jörn >> >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > All, >> >> > I was wondering if it makes sense to extend QUnits equals method so >> > that it returns true if I compare two objects (or arrays)? >> >> > Background: I'm currently writing unit test for tabs, precisely I'm >> > testing the default values where there are two options that have an >> > empty object respectively array as default value. >> >> > I could also roll my own equality check or think about using other >> > values as default values. >> >> > Any suggestions? >> >> > --Klaus > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
