Remember also that we need to try and make this work without browser detection. I'm assuming we'll have to do a quick feature detection. -- Brandon Aaron
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Paul Bakaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > This is quite cool! > > I've been thinking about this for quite some time, and it's nice to > see > someone else having the same idea. If we could land a solid version of > that > in the core, that'd be awesome. > > I'm thinking about how feasible it would be to port easing as well - > CSS Transforms support easing, but I'm not sure about the format. Any > idea? > > On Oct 19, 10:57 am, weepy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've put together a proof of concept for using Webkit CSS animations > > where possible. You can find it at : > > > > http://www.parkerfox.co.uk/labs/css-webkit-animation-jquery-proof-of-... > > > > It creates a wrapper function $.animate2 that runs the equivalent CSS > > animation if the $.browser.safari = true or runs the original animate > > code otherwise. > > > > There's also a stress test page here : > http://www.parkerfox.co.uk/labs/css-webkit-animation-jquery-stress-te... > > > > As you can see the test is too much for the JS animation, but the CSS > > animation works fine. > > > > Tested on Firefox, Chrome, iPhone. > > > > weepy > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
