yeah, don't there though. there is alot that can be done to make it really rockin' without making it overly complex as well (my usual fault). For example, starting with what I had, what do you think is missing or would be an awesome feature? Is the jsonpath implementation efficient, or could it be 10x faster if we just tweak this line or that line. It's definitely not done, and if you think it would be useful, tear into it, I think folks could make good use of a simple but robust solution.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:42 PM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris, > > Yeah, I think MIT/GPL is the best scheme I've seen as it allows for two > similar yet very different levels of freedom. > > I may need to contact Ariel to figure out the details, however when gpl > is used with a mit/gpl codebase there really isn't that big of a drawback. > > I find it really exciting however that when I look for a solution, it has > already been made. > > -- Elijah > > > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:05 PM, chris thatcher < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> no offense taken. Which license is GPL only? you mean jquery.collection >> ? I'm really not very license savy. I bet we could poke Ariel with a stick >> and see how he responds? Is MIT/GPL the goal? >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Chris, >>> >>> I do appreciate it! I guess i was just thinking out loud as I am >>> currently looking at providing the sources as BSD or MIT/GPL. I mean no >>> harm :) >>> >>> --Elijah >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:56 PM, chris thatcher < >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> ok, not really sure what you mean about 'maintain a scheme' and how open >>>> source prohibits that, but I was just trying to provide a helpful example. >>>> good luck! >>>> >>>> Thatcher >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> sounds really cool, the only down side is the license. I would like to >>>>> maintain a scheme, and locking it to GPL seems inappropriate in my >>>>> situation. hrm.. >>>>> >>>>> -- Elijah >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:35 PM, chris thatcher < >>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I posted a very bare bones project on github, jquery.jsonpath uses >>>>>> jquery.collection(Ariel Flesler flesler.blogspot.com), json2.js >>>>>> (JSON.org), and Stefan Goessner (goessner.net) jsonpath to provide a >>>>>> simple jquery-like selector engine for large javascript objects. I'd >>>>>> like >>>>>> it to become a useful foundation for plugins that are >>>>>> 'template-centric', eg >>>>>> i18n, capitalize, title, lorem ipsum, etc. Seems useful to me and very >>>>>> jquery-like thanks to jquery.collections. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:10 AM, chris thatcher < >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Becuase e4x has limited support in browsers, (firefox has awesome >>>>>>> support for it) I had started a plugin that used jsonpath ( >>>>>>> http://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/) and jquery.collection ( >>>>>>> http://flesler.blogspot.com/2008/01/jquerycollection.html) together >>>>>>> to provide a jquery-like way to query large js objects. The project got >>>>>>> dusty, mainly because it tried to cram too much functionality into it >>>>>>> and it >>>>>>> became unwieldy. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm going to take it off the shelf for a few hours this morning and >>>>>>> hack it down into a more useful core. My personal goal for creating it >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> to use it in templates and allow jquery-like plugins to add >>>>>>> functionality to >>>>>>> it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If your curious I'll create a github project and post the code up >>>>>>> there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thatcher >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:55 AM, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It sounds like what you're looking for is something like E4X: >>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E4X >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately it doesn't have very good browser support so it isn't >>>>>>>> used very frequently. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --John >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Elijah Insua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> > First Post!~ >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > What do you think about using the xpath engine for querying object >>>>>>>> > structures? >>>>>>>> > To my understanding the 'only' way to actually run xpath/xquery >>>>>>>> > functionality on >>>>>>>> > xml is to first convert it into an object. Why not convert it >>>>>>>> into a >>>>>>>> > standard object >>>>>>>> > that can be queried generically? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > -- Elijah >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Christopher Thatcher >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Christopher Thatcher >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christopher Thatcher >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Christopher Thatcher >> >> >> > > > > -- Christopher Thatcher --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
