Thanks John! Looks like I'll use that to create my own objFilter
method :).
On Jan 22, 7:48 pm, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Previously certain selectors worked on non-nodes. This is both
> unexpected and unsupported (and absolutely not guaranteed to work
> cross browser - especially with the new querySelectorAll stuff
> landing). Removing this "feature" was definitely a bug fix.
>
> So, what are the alternatives? Right now your best bet is probably:
>
> $(someObject).filter(function(){ return this.name === "value"; })
>
> Just use a function and a custom expression to do any filtering. I
> hope this helps!
>
> --John
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ryura <yoyobo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ello,
>
> > In 1.2.6 I can do
>
> > var data = {};
> > data.x = {
> > a: [],
> > b: []
> > }
>
> > data.x.a.push({
> > name: "foo",
> > num: 0
> > });
>
> > data.x.a.push({
> > name: "foo2",
> > num: 0
> > });
>
> > $(data.x.a).filter('[name="foo"]')
>
> > And I get the expected object {
> > name: "foo",
> > num: 0
> > }
>
> > However, in 1.3 I now get an empty jQuery object (length=0). Has this
> > (undocumented) functionality been removed due to Sizzle? Are there any
> > plans to bring it back in a future release? I *need* to use this for a
> > large project I've been working on, but we want to upgrade to 1.3
> > for .live() and Sizzle's enhancements.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
