No worries -- that just means I can get working on a patch as soon as time allows ;p
-- dz On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Karl Swedberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, this is my mistake. The bug is still there. Probably should have > read the bug report more closely before I spoke up. > I was looking at .val() as a getter, which *is* working correctly. The > problem is with it as a setter ( .val('value') ) > I put up a test case here: > http://test.learningjquery.com/option-values.html > The value of the select is reported correctly on change, but if you set it > programmatically (click the button), it sets it to the wrong value. > Looks like the ticket was just closed and then re-opened. > Sorry for the confusion, everyone. > > --Karl > ____________ > Karl Swedberg > www.englishrules.com > www.learningjquery.com > > > > On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:27 AM, Karl Swedberg wrote: > > no prob. glad you brought it up. another closed bug is a good thing! I'll > close it. > > --Karl > ____________ > Karl Swedberg > www.englishrules.com > www.learningjquery.com > > > > On Jan 28, 2009, at 9:01 AM, David Zhou wrote: > > Ah, okay, cool. Probably should have done a quick test to verify it > first on my part. The ticket should probably be closed though if it's > fixed. I saw a more recent ticket marked as a duplicate of this one, > so assumed it was still open. > > -- dz > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Karl Swedberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi David, > > It looks like this is fixed in jquery.js 1.3.1: > > lines 406-07 (within the val function): > > if( jQuery.nodeName( elem, 'option' ) ) > > return (elem.attributes.value || {}).specified ? elem.value : elem.text; > > and lines 424-26: > > if ( option.selected ) { > > // Get the specifc value for the option > > value = jQuery(option).val(); > > --Karl > > ____________ > > Karl Swedberg > > www.englishrules.com > > www.learningjquery.com > > > > On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:24 AM, David Zhou wrote: > > http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3104 > > Seeing as last activity was around 4 months ago, is this still being > > worked on? I was thinking about working on a patch, but was unsure if > > someone had decided to leave the behavior as it currently is. > > -- dz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
