It looks like a rewrite of Sizzle/jQuery. Very good performance with cache on, I thought Peppy wouldn't be beaten so early. Code is a bit messy.
But is it reliable? Is there a test suite for it? The 'nocache' version timed at 29 seconds for :nth-child(odd) in slickspeed for me, and horrible performance overall. Also there is something wrong in the SlickSpeed implementation. Sizzle's results i.e. are far far different from it's own slickspeed test at http://ejohn.org/apps/sizzle/speed/, with timings like 707ms for a simple 'div p'. The slickspeed.js code has been largely altered. " - Have you looked at the source code?" I read this exact same sentence at the 'javascript' group (usenet) about an year ago, about jQuery. That shouldn't be disencouraging :) cheers, - ricardo On Jan 27, 7:45 pm, Elijah Insua <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:36 PM, KidsKilla .grin! wuz here < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > 2009/1/28 John Resig <[email protected]>: > > > > A whole mess of problems: > > > - Caches queries with reckless abandon - this is incredibly bad on > > > any sort of dynamic document (aka - all of jQuery) > > it is, but maybe there is some way to recognize when we can use a > > cache and when we can't. kinda > > if(lastInnerHTML != document.body.innerHTML){ > > resetCache() > > } > > that method of cache expiry is pretty gruesome and is as bad (or worse!) as > not having a cache at all. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
