Why patch it, John ? there's no speed gain and I actually think it'd
make things slower.
If you save the regex in a var within the upper scope, each access
will take longer than if it were 100% local.

--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com

On Feb 1, 10:09 pm, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ah, ok. I suspect that some of that may be in Sizzle. Patches are welcome!
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Diego Perini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > John,
> > well I did some small test with:
>
> > /\s+/
> > /\\/g
>
> > and it seems there is no appreciable speed gain that I could measure.
>
> > I spotted those shorter RegExp because I saw they are re-used at least
> > 4 or 5 times in current jQuery.
>
> > Thanks to jdalton for the link and explanation.
>
> > Diego
>
> > On 1 Feb, 15:53, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Is there any appreciable speed-up to caching RegExp that are that
> >> small? I wasn't able to find any when I looked.
>
> >> --John
>
> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Diego Perini <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > I did have a quick look through the code and see that most of the
> >> > (small) regular expressions are not cached and referenced but defined
> >> > in-line in the conditionals/replacements.
>
> >> > For example these are repeatedly used in various place:
>
> >> > /\s+/
> >> > /\\/g
> >> > /\?/
>
> >> > I believe there are improvements in both speed and readability of code
> >> > by caching them compiled.
>
> >> > Is there some reason I don't know in not defining some constants like
> >> > TRIM, SQUEEZE, ESCAPE etc... ?
>
> >> > Diego- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to