Sweet. I find this to be a quite important issue and the solution proposed here seems effective.
I guess in IE the performance improvement is much greater than x1000 On Feb 1, 6:19 pm, Dimi Paun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 09:57 -0500, John Resig wrote: > > Cool, yeah, I'm down for those. We were debating the usefulness of > > trim() for 1.3 (since it was used so infrequently in core). We're > > going to leave the method in, for the time being, but I agree that > > will help to speed things up significantly. > > Hey, I was a bit upset that my title said (x100/x1000), I really wanted > it to say just x1000 :) So I did a second version of .blank() that can > claim that and more: > http://zipalong.com/blog/?p=287 > > Enjoy! > > -- > Dimi Paun <[email protected]> > Lattica, Inc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
