jQuery's fx.js module is exactly the same size, 10kb uncompressed, and probably answers for 2kb in the 19kb of jQuery gzipped.
On Mar 31, 2:13 pm, CyanFloor <cyanflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > You're missing an important point: THE SIZE!!!! > GX's only 2kb gzipped and in my opinion it's fantastic... > > On 14 Mar, 00:44, Paul Bakaus <paul.bak...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > The only difference is that it handles properties with multiple values. > > Everything else can be done with jQuery UI + jQuery. > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Jörn Zaefferer < > > > joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > Seehttp://ajaxian.com/archives/gx-a-new-animation-framework > > > > Would someone with a better understanding of jQuery's and jQuery UI's > > > animation features mind taking a look to see what that framework > > > actually adds that we don't already support out of the box? > > > > Eg. relative animations are promoted, I'm pretty sure we have them > > > already. > > > > In any case, we may need better animation documentation. > > > > Jörn > > > -- > > Paul Bakaus > > UI Architect > > --http://paulbakaus.comhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbakaus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
