It would be good to see DOM speed results compare to other libraries and see which libraries comes the closest to it. But I would never expect any library to match it on all tests. But then again that TaskSpeed test only take into consideration few basics tests and not the overall performance of akll the functionalities within a library.
On Apr 2, 9:23 am, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to bring here as well these > results:http://webreflection.blogspot.com/2009/04/taskspeed-dom-vs-libraries.... > > Dojo team is already working about this and I think it makes sense to, at > least, consider the fact every library is somehow penalizing Internet > Explorer. > As I wrote in the Dojo ML, I am not sure this is the right direction to > follow. > > What I mean is that every team seems to compare few milliseconds for the > "fastest library medal", and in already fast browsers, but apparently no > one is considering that the most used browser with the slowest JS engine > (you got it, it's Internet Explorer) performs extremely bad with every > common library, compared to native DOM implemented tasks. > > Dojo already created a page to try to fix the > gap:http://bill.dojotoolkit.org/taskspeed/ > > I hope my test will help to improve IE overall performances with jQuery too > but obviously it is up to you to decide what to do about it :) > > Regards --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
