I love that functionality, looks good to me! Paul Bakaus UI Architect http://paulbakaus.com
Am 04.05.2009 um 06:47 schrieb Brandon Aaron <[email protected]>: > Looking for any feedback on #3699 before committing, which is for > allowing an alternative scope for events. There is a patch attached > to the ticket. The ticket actually proposes a method signature that > doesn't really fit jQuery's style. I added a patch that allows the > following call signature instead. > > $(...).bind("type", fn, scope); > $(...).bind("type", data, fn, scope); > > This also applies to .one() and .live(). > > The patch utilizes the internal event.proxy method with a tweak to > include an optional scope. > > -- > Brandon Aaron > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
